X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:14:37 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d21.mx.aol.com ([205.188.144.207] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.11) with ESMTP id 2280394 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:14:10 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.144.207; envelope-from=ETLTYT@aol.com Received: from ETLTYT@aol.com by imo-d21.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.2.) id q.cd2.1919031a (39954) for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:13:24 -0400 (EDT) From: ETLTYT@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 11:13:23 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: LNC 2 Hydraulic Cylinder X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1187882003" X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5041 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1187882003 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chris, Thanks for the response. I failed to mention the sealing washer in my post. Is it normal to have a second AN washer between the sealing washer and the locknut? Or should the locknut be torqued down against the sealing washer? Kai ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour -------------------------------1187882003 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Chris,

Thanks for the response. I failed to mention the sealing wa= sher=20 in my post. Is it normal to have a second AN washer between the sealing wash= er=20 and the locknut? Or should the locknut be torqued down against the sealing=20 washer?

Kai

Get a sneak peek of the all-new AO= L.com.

-------------------------------1187882003--