X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:40:02 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-2279954@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <kyrilian_av@yahoo.com>
Received: from web53703.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([206.190.37.24] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.11)
  with SMTP id 2279672 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 02:33:15 -0400
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.190.37.24; envelope-from=kyrilian_av@yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 6807 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Aug 2007 06:32:36 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID;
  b=U1GKM/u5I0iTFwl15XKcxZcXj9e/aLnjtEx9kh2a3rOEk+5sZVi5JMmPs7j25mvvMN0Jidnv7BYsxlHtbjN9VIFVkcF/TfFaQn1vGR8weeWJCY0n2StRyvZxjGQMhqBk36XuFfwIuRxdcYEUifBTvpsJUJ/lC8fzUR0BxDulA88=;
X-YMail-OSG: yAhsBkcVM1mFjITDQRGkW2mAUlxrsy_mgbUopoE8xyQHTQjIeVxBu.TdhMZoj1HbYA--
Received: from [76.166.203.134] by web53703.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 23:32:36 PDT
X-Original-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 23:32:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kyrilian Dyer <kyrilian_av@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: wing leak
X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-2278498@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-444503278-1187850756=:5683"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Original-Message-ID: <534593.5683.qm@web53703.mail.re2.yahoo.com>

--0-444503278-1187850756=:5683
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

I didn't reverse the balloons, but I did do the same test a few times (with different balloons at different times) and got similar results.  I'll do the test again under more controlled/monitored conditions.

Sky2high@aol.com wrote:      Yes.  Did you then reverse the balloons?  There is no guarantee that the one on the plane did not have a leak (presumption).  Otherwise, use high quality condoms as the Surgeon General's Office warranties that they are free of leaks.
   
  The other problem with these tests is a change in the barometric pressure.  Higher baro, smaller balloon and vice versa. Maybe a better test would be to use a water tube loop mounted vertically and calibrated in inches.  Take a barometric reading when sealed and also the next day and correct the resultant water level reading.  This way use can test with both positive and negative pressure.
   
   
  Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk
Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96
Aurora, IL (KARR)

Darwinian culling phrase: Watch This!



    
---------------------------------
  Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL.com.


       
---------------------------------
Be a better Globetrotter. Get better travel answers from someone who knows.
Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.
--0-444503278-1187850756=:5683
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

I didn't reverse the balloons, but I did do the same test a few times (with different balloons at different times) and got similar results.&nbsp; I'll do the test again under more controlled/monitored conditions.<BR><BR><B><I>Sky2high@aol.com</I></B> wrote:  <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">  <META content="MSHTML 6.00.6000.16525" name=GENERATOR><FONT id=role_document face=Arial color=#000000 size=2>  <DIV>Yes.&nbsp; Did you then reverse the balloons?&nbsp; There is no guarantee that the one on the plane did not have a leak (presumption).&nbsp; Otherwise, use high quality condoms as the Surgeon General's Office warranties that they are free of leaks.</DIV>  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>  <DIV>The other problem with these tests is a change in the barometric pressure.&nbsp; Higher baro, smaller balloon and vice versa. Maybe a better test would be to use a water tube loop mounted vertically and calibrated in inches.&nbsp;
 Take a barometric reading when sealed and also the next day and correct the resultant water level reading.&nbsp; This way use can test with both positive and negative&nbsp;pressure.</DIV>  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>  <DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>  <DIV><FONT lang=0 face=Arial size=2 FAMILY="SANSSERIF" PTSIZE="10">Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk<BR>Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96<BR>Aurora, IL (KARR)<BR><BR>Darwinian culling phrase: Watch This!</FONT></DIV></FONT><BR><BR><BR>  <DIV><FONT style="FONT: 10pt ARIAL, SAN-SERIF; COLOR: black">  <HR style="MARGIN-TOP: 10px">  Get a sneak peek of the all-new <A title=http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour/?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000982 href="http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour/?ncid=AOLAOF00020000000982" target=_blank>AOL.com</A>.</FONT></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE><BR><p>&#32;
      <hr size=1>Be a better Globetrotter. <a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48254/*http://answers.yahoo.com/dir/_ylc=X3oDMTI5MGx2aThyBF9TAzIxMTU1MDAzNTIEX3MDMzk2NTQ1MTAzBHNlYwNCQUJwaWxsYXJfTklfMzYwBHNsawNQcm9kdWN0X3F1ZXN0aW9uX3BhZ2U-?link=list&sid=396545469">Get better travel answers </a>from someone who knows.<br>Yahoo! Answers - Check it out.


--0-444503278-1187850756=:5683--