X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2007 07:40:02 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-2279978@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <kyrilian_av@yahoo.com>
Received: from web53706.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([206.190.37.27] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.11)
  with SMTP id 2279664 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 23 Aug 2007 02:39:30 -0400
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.190.37.27; envelope-from=kyrilian_av@yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 20126 invoked by uid 60001); 23 Aug 2007 06:38:52 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-ID;
  b=YgF2++uhGNtC1F1YIeW11HD59tEv3/Y2iplavo6j4yXcD6qMTZvfjMe2v0TmenCxF/STKqEoQVJvUvl7ISE45dgym1IOQk6MWnXk8VqUqJdCmn9XbU2nVehzkK3QnYr5iXBgrgo73LReq87f1duoCIESISfMGCLBj8+SoMEUU5I=;
X-YMail-OSG: F0rH1T4VM1lFxWHnYHFrAC5blVdw_WseadX9jkU93xPjU2PI4D0oJ8Au4ZB3MtGDxqlp1ioEGIEkLIXZPFLMmX090wDMzeFSDVHS9K7tOZHhn9MWinvEdKFTTTQX
Received: from [76.166.203.134] by web53706.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 22 Aug 2007 23:38:52 PDT
X-Original-Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2007 23:38:52 -0700 (PDT)
From: Kyrilian Dyer <kyrilian_av@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: wing leak
X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-2278495@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1044830561-1187851132=:19117"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Original-Message-ID: <426859.19117.qm@web53706.mail.re2.yahoo.com>

--0-1044830561-1187851132=:19117
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

I agree about the large volume.  I probably didn't properly account for this change.
  I've taped the leading edge and checked all holes, packing tape edges, fittings and distinct joints with soapy water and a chip brush.  Perhaps it's leaking so little that I didn't notice the bubbles, or in a place I didn't check.  Did priming and body work change the results of your air leak-down tests?
  

Micah Froese <micah@froese.com> wrote:
  Wing has a lot of volume, this can make the balloon inflate/deflate with changing temperature or pressure.   Also I had a lot of problem with packing tape, seems air always found an escape path in the carbon that wasn't body worked and primed.  As for finding leaks, just use soapy water and a chip brush, leaks will bubble up.

       
---------------------------------
Ready for the edge of your seat? Check out tonight's top picks on Yahoo! TV. 
--0-1044830561-1187851132=:19117
Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<div>I agree about the large volume.&nbsp; I probably didn't properly account for this change.</div>  <div>I've taped the leading edge and checked all holes, packing tape edges, fittings and distinct joints with soapy water and a chip brush.&nbsp; Perhaps it's leaking so little that I didn't notice the bubbles, or in a place I didn't check.&nbsp; Did priming and body work change the results of your air leak-down tests?</div>  <div><BR><BR><B><I>Micah Froese &lt;micah@froese.com&gt;</I></B> wrote:</div>  <BLOCKQUOTE class=replbq style="PADDING-LEFT: 5px; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px; BORDER-LEFT: #1010ff 2px solid">Wing has a lot of volume, this can make the balloon inflate/deflate with changing temperature or pressure. &nbsp; Also I had a lot of problem with packing tape, seems air always found an escape path in the carbon that wasn't body worked and primed.&nbsp; As for finding leaks, just use soapy water and a chip brush, leaks will bubble up.<BR></BLOCKQUOTE><p>&#32;
      <hr size=1>Ready for the edge of your seat? 
<a href="http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48220/*http://tv.yahoo.com/">Check out tonight's top picks</a> on Yahoo! TV. 


--0-1044830561-1187851132=:19117--