X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 17:05:41 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from web82713.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.201.27] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.11) with SMTP id 2272099 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 09:34:34 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.142.201.27; envelope-from=earleschroeder@yahoo.com Received: (qmail 92567 invoked by uid 60001); 19 Aug 2007 13:33:46 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=iFfFsNZxy8avqp0XNJUMln3w0JRyvGJewxYtKkqWIUS3vax5mNs/MH0NpbAvvNUn6o5AFNZWHMoGdr+y9GJvyQQFKABdvR9BOE4KR81KFJ3f4OQo2Y2Fcqft72fRSbXw5uiVii+ul8t6Yu3Gkr8G98JFPHkoNM4bsBrvC79fpYY=; X-YMail-OSG: SInOQi0VM1klbaQDI2zYyivcApQlasxmtZYP3KKYJM6mmPCCPBkYfB9hsX6Xub7QoZpRvvXgXA07rlROjr4XkQkhBzcRDuNNwJDdoVoxG3ZhVBGvqxk- Received: from [75.16.244.32] by web82713.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 19 Aug 2007 06:33:45 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/651.48 YahooMailWebService/0.7.119 X-Original-Date: Sun, 19 Aug 2007 06:33:45 -0700 (PDT) From: Earl Schroeder Subject: Re: [LML] Oil Filler access door on Legacy X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-839843947-1187530425=:91368" X-Original-Message-ID: <982479.91368.qm@web82713.mail.mud.yahoo.com> --0-839843947-1187530425=:91368 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Barry,=0AMy concern would be 'why is there so much pressure in that area'? = My oil filler door is behind the high pressure area.. or as I understand i= t, should be. Earl=0A=0A----- Original Message ----=0AFrom: Barry Hancock = =0ATo: lml@lancaironline.net=0ASent: Saturday, August 18= , 2007 10:33:04 PM=0ASubject: [LML] Oil Filler access door on Legacy=0A=0AG= ang,=0A=0ADuring a recent cross country flight, the latch to the oil filler= =0Adoor on the top of the cowl departed the aircraft. Upon inspection = =0Amy door latch was installed with two rivets...to replicate the =0Aorigi= nal installation would mean a bunch of work to refinish and =0Arepaint the= door. We opted to fabricate a new latch and glue it =0Aon....worked grea= t until I hit 250 KIAS today and the glue gave up - =0Alots of pressure on= that door.=0A=0AI'm sure for normal ops the glue would be just fine, but t= he pressure =0Acreated by the higher airspeeds is too much. Does anyone h= ave any =0Asuggestions on a "non-invasive" fix. We can take the door off= and =0Are-rivet it...but that failed after 270 hours of flight and I'd li= ke =0Ato find a better solution. And, NO Greyhawk, I won't slow down.... = ;)=0A=0AThanks!=0A=0ABarry=0A122LL=0A=0A--=0AFor archives and unsub http://= mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html=0A=0A=0A=0A=0A --0-839843947-1187530425=:91368 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Barry,
My concern would be 'why is there so much= pressure in that area'?  My oil filler door is behind the high pressu= re area.. or as I understand it, should be.  Earl

-----= Original Message ----
From: Barry Hancock <sportform@cox.net>
= To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2007 10:33:04 PMSubject: [LML] Oil Filler access door on Legacy

Gang,

D= uring a recent cross country flight, the latch to the oil filler  = ;
door on the top of the cowl departed the aircraft.  Upon ins= pection  
my door latch was installed with two rivets...to replicate the  
original installation would mean a bunch of w= ork to refinish and  
repaint the door.  We opted to= fabricate a new latch and glue it  
on....worked great until = I hit 250 KIAS today and the glue gave up -  
lots of pressure= on that door.

I'm sure for normal ops the glue would be just fine, = but the pressure  
created by the higher airspeeds is too much= .  Does anyone have any  
suggestions on a "non-inva= sive" fix.   We can take the door off and  
re-rivet= it...but that failed after 270 hours of flight and I'd like  to find a better solution.  And, NO Greyhawk, I won't slow down.= ... ;)

Thanks!

Barry
122LL

--
For archives and u= nsub http://mail.= lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html

--0-839843947-1187530425=:91368--