Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #43282
From: Douglas Brunner <douglasbrunner@earthlink.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Template of Leading Edges
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 05:48:25 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
I saw a very nice Legacy at Oshkosh owned by Allen Frazier.  What was most impressive was his reported top speed of 263 ktas at 7,500.  (for the cynics out there, he described what sounded to me like an accurate method for determining his speed)
 
I spent some time talking to him to try to find out his "secret" - why is his plane so fast?  Apparently, in a former life, he was an aeronautical engineer and during his build he spent a lot of time paying attention to aerodynamic details including his cowl inlets (which he narrowed slightly) and his leading edges which he spent a lot of time getting right.  As far as I recall, he didn't use any of the available "speed mods".  (Allen - please correct me if I am wrong)
 
This lead me to thinking - after we have finished closing the wings, h. stab and rudders, put on the BIDS, sanded, put on micro and sanded again:
  • How close are we to the designed airfoil?
  • Is it possible that we may have squeezed the wing too tight and made it too narrow or added too much micro and made it too blunt?
  • Can we get the correct airfoil by hand sanding?
  • How do we know what the correct airfoil is - by eyeball?
  • Is there a better way?
I am thinking of "templating" my leading edges - getting a template that is the correct airfoil and attempting to get the leading edges as close to design as possible.
  • Does this make sense?
  • Am I wasting my time chasing 1 or 2 knots?
  • What is the best method of getting the correct airfoil?
  • Has anyone else done this?
 
D. Brunner
N241DB
90% done 30% to go
 
 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster