X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2007 07:49:49 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m24.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.5] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.10) with ESMTP id 2181558 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:16:24 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.5; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-m24.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.2.) id q.d65.c6f32cf (48552) for ; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:15:40 -0400 (EDT) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 20:15:40 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: WARBIRD ARRIVAL X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1184631340" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5365 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1184631340 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 7/16/2007 6:42:42 P.M. Central Daylight Time, earleschroeder@yahoo.com writes: I asked a 'supervisor' who works Oshkosh a similar question last Wed at our local EAA meeting. He said 'they' don't like it [when Lancairs fly the warbird approach] but they don't do anything about it. He also added that the 'Lancairs' cause them the most trouble of all the types that visit Oshkosh... [no specific details were forthcoming] I also asked when they expected the 135K level to descend to the 90K level. He said to stay high until the tower frequency suggests lower. He said that the tower controller would be looking for a clear spot below to provide a safe descent. He reminded everyone to keep the pattern in 'tight'. Do not string out over the lake on the 27 approach 'cause they can't see you. Maybe the "supervisor" should take a ride in a Lancair (360,Legacy and IV) with emphasis on an approach to landing. The aviation community has advanced (or regressed, depending on your depends) beyond Cubs and 172's. Grayhawk ************************************** Get a sneak peek of the all-new AOL at http://discover.aol.com/memed/aolcom30tour -------------------------------1184631340 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 7/16/2007 6:42:42 P.M. Central Daylight Time,=20 earleschroeder@yahoo.com writes:
<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3D"Times New Roman" color=3D#= 000000=20 size=3D3>I asked a 'supervisor' who works Oshkosh a similar question last=20= Wed at=20 our local EAA meeting.  He said 'they' don't like it [when Lancairs f= ly=20 the warbird approach] but they don't do anything about it.  He also a= dded=20 that the 'Lancairs' cause them the most trouble of all the types that visi= t=20 Oshkosh... [no specific details were forthcoming]

I also asked when= =20 they expected the 135K level to descend to the 90K level.  He said to= =20 stay high until the tower frequency suggests lower.  He said that the= =20 tower controller would be looking for a clear spot below to provide a safe= =20 descent.  He reminded everyone to keep the pattern in 'tight'. =20= Do=20 not string out over the lake on the 27 approach 'cause they can't see=20 you.
Maybe the "supervisor" should take a ride in a Lancair (360,Legacy and=20= IV)=20 with emphasis on an approach to landing.  The aviation community has=20 advanced (or regressed, depending on your depends) beyond Cubs and=20 172's.
 
Grayhawk



Get a sneak=20= peek of the all-new AOL.com. -------------------------------1184631340--