X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 19:42:12 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from web82704.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.201.85] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.10) with SMTP id 2180796 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:28:20 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.142.201.85; envelope-from=earleschroeder@yahoo.com Received: (qmail 83993 invoked by uid 60001); 16 Jul 2007 17:27:39 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Message-ID; b=2jP49j/4mHgL91i+khnHTgJL/GTdO9GziroYNRO0IgvyVMe4J4TBVb40qM+rZgnPQbelLNuyhG2gBJRbaHXbl2XuGbO3KkBHJ7LXzBNzAiyrjT37HkBQtzFj2EzGTxBsTRVPFqK+aYdQuln1MLx+iLglzDUt2hJl+a7/Cn2Keg0=; X-YMail-OSG: lfNUHkoVM1lBJTpOKAKAZczov.btBNtdqlzqQfFcSL18FpO9Z81gxEsU4JaHB5.qZQzS7LxJag-- Received: from [75.16.234.192] by web82704.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:27:39 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/651.38 YahooMailWebService/0.7.41.16 X-Original-Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:27:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Earl Schroeder Subject: Re: [LML] WARBIRD ARRIVAL X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-2010494595-1184606859=:83971" X-Original-Message-ID: <603065.83971.qm@web82704.mail.mud.yahoo.com> --0-2010494595-1184606859=:83971 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ascii Hi Charlie K, I asked a 'supervisor' who works Oshkosh a similar question last Wed at our local EAA meeting. He said 'they' don't like it [when Lancairs fly the warbird approach] but they don't do anything about it. He also added that the 'Lancairs' cause them the most trouble of all the types that visit Oshkosh... [no specific details were forthcoming] I also asked when they expected the 135K level to descend to the 90K level. He said to stay high until the tower frequency suggests lower. He said that the tower controller would be looking for a clear spot below to provide a safe descent. He reminded everyone to keep the pattern in 'tight'. Do not string out over the lake on the 27 approach 'cause they can't see you. Be safe! Earl ----- Original Message ---- From: Charlie Kohler : This procedure is restricted to highperformance turbojet and twin turboprop aircraft and to Warbird aircraft capable of cruising at 130 knots or greater. Jeff E. Has anyone asked for an exemption for High Performance Lancair's??? Charlie K. --0-2010494595-1184606859=:83971 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ascii

Hi Charlie K,
I asked a 'supervisor' who works Oshkosh a similar question last Wed at our local EAA meeting. He said 'they' don't like it [when Lancairs fly the warbird approach] but they don't do anything about it. He also added that the 'Lancairs' cause them the most trouble of all the types that visit Oshkosh... [no specific details were forthcoming]

I also asked when they expected the 135K level to descend to the 90K level. He said to stay high until the tower frequency suggests lower. He said that the tower controller would be looking for a clear spot below to provide a safe descent. He reminded everyone to keep the pattern in 'tight'. Do not string out over the lake on the 27 approach 'cause they can't see you.

Be safe! Earl

----- Original Message ----
From: Charlie Kohler <charliekohler@yahoo.com>

: This procedure is restricted to highperformance turbojet and twin turboprop aircraft and to Warbird aircraft capable of

cruising at 130 knots or greater.

Jeff E.

Has anyone asked for an exemption for High Performance Lancair's???

Charlie K.

--0-2010494595-1184606859=:83971--