X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:06:40 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from S3.cableone.net ([24.116.0.229] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.10) with ESMTP id 2170038 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 19:26:04 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.116.0.229; envelope-from=bbreen@cableone.net Received: from toshibauser (unverified [72.24.135.163]) by S3.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S3) with ESMTP id 114888624 for ; Tue, 10 Jul 2007 16:25:26 -0700 X-Original-Return-Path: From: "Berni" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: WSI Weather X-Original-Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 18:25:25 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002D_01C7C31F.AFA4BCC0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcfDCm0MOOYFt3zHTOKrIAUNIPRLBQAPct+A X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 In-Reply-To: X-Original-Message-ID: <1184109926_51449@S3.cableone.net> X-SpamDetect: *******: 7.037000 No such thing as a free lunch (3)=0.7,From3consonants=0.3,Possible url forgery/scam=2.0,Uses non-standard port number for HTTP=1.3,Aspam=2.7 X-UrlForgery: (http://mail.lancaironline.net) (http://mail) X-NotAscii: charset=us-ascii X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 3, First 18, in=16, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 72.24.135.163 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002D_01C7C31F.AFA4BCC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Guys: My Lancair IV came out of the "project hanger" following a 19 month turbine conversion. Prior to the project I utilized WSI viewed through my MX20. Following 3 months of flight testing and tweaking I brought my airplane to the radio shop to get all of my avionics checked and to get the airplane IFR certified. This is when I learned of the WSI issues that are now upon its users. I have been told that as an existing customer I should soon be receiving a letter explaining that I will be given no cost new hardware to replace my existing WSI stuff. I will have to pay for installation but that cost should be nominal. Is this consistent with what you guys have been hearing? Berni Breen _____ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Chuck Jensen Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2007 10:41 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: WSI Weather Jack/Rob, Thanks for the feed back on the WSI--the problem must be local. Are both of you switching to the new antenna and WSI Sirius service in the next couple months? Are there any alternatives for the CNX-480/MX20 combo for weather? Chuck Jensen -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Jack Cowell Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 11:20 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: WSI Weather I flew from eastern NY to Maine and back yesterday in some challenging and varied weather and the WSI was its usual, reliable self. I did have some signal loss warnings from WAAS satellites on the CNX 80 but the GPS still gave waypoint and flight plan information and displayed it on the MX20 On 7/9/07, Rob Logan wrote: > check with anyone else running WSI weather on flights friday and sat of ~6hrs had good BER and no dropouts. -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html. ------=_NextPart_000_002D_01C7C31F.AFA4BCC0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

Guys:

 

My Lancair IV came out of the = “project hanger” following a 19 month turbine conversion.  Prior to = the project I utilized WSI viewed through my MX20.  Following 3 months = of flight testing and tweaking I brought my airplane to the radio shop to get all = of my avionics checked and to get the airplane IFR certified.  This is = when I learned of the WSI issues that are now upon its users.  I have been = told that as an existing customer I should soon be receiving a letter = explaining that I will be given no cost new hardware to replace my existing WSI = stuff.  I will have to pay for installation but that cost should be = nominal.  Is this consistent with what you guys have been = hearing?

 

Berni Breen =

 

From: = Lancair Mailing List = [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Chuck Jensen
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, = 2007 10:41 AM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: WSI = Weather

 

Jack/Rob,

 

Thanks for the feed back on the WSI--the problem must = be local.  Are both of you switching to the new antenna and WSI Sirius service in the next couple months?  Are there any alternatives for = the CNX-480/MX20 combo for weather?


Chuck Jensen

 

 -----Original = Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Jack Cowell
Sent: Monday, July 09, = 2007 11:20 PM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: WSI = Weather

I flew from = eastern NY to Maine and back yesterday in some challenging and varied weather and the WSI was = its usual, reliable self.  I did have some signal loss warnings from = WAAS satellites on the CNX 80 but the GPS still gave waypoint and flight plan information and displayed it on the MX20

On 7/9/07, Rob Logan <Rob@logan.com> = wrote:


> check with anyone else running WSI weather

on flights friday and sat of ~6hrs had good BER and no dropouts.

--
For archives and unsub http://mail= .lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html.

 

------=_NextPart_000_002D_01C7C31F.AFA4BCC0--