X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:00:24 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from ironport5.liveoakmail.com ([216.110.12.21] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.10) with ESMTP id 2165177 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 08 Jul 2007 08:38:50 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.110.12.21; envelope-from=walter@advancedpilot.com X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8CAEp3kEZAMf4V/2dsb2JhbACCZA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.16,513,1175490000"; d="scan'208,217";a="21055423" Received: from rs5.liveoakhosting.com (HELO secure5.liveoakhosting.com) ([64.49.254.21]) by ironport5.liveoakmail.com with ESMTP; 08 Jul 2007 07:38:11 -0500 Received: (qmail 9568 invoked from network); 8 Jul 2007 07:38:11 -0500 Received: from ip68-108-233-213.br.br.cox.net (HELO ?10.0.1.2?) (68.108.233.213) by rs5.liveoakhosting.com with (AES128-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 8 Jul 2007 07:38:11 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.3) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-1--567380499 X-Original-Message-Id: <5BE320BD-70DB-4FC8-BC7C-FFAF0F7DF608@advancedpilot.com> From: Walter Atkinson Subject: Re: [LML] Re: TSIO-550 turbine inlet probes X-Original-Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2007 07:37:29 -0500 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.3) --Apple-Mail-1--567380499 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Colyn: The TIT GAS is cooler than the exhaust GAS... it's further down the line... it's had time to cool more. So, why does TIT READ higher? Walter On Jul 7, 2007, at 7:34 PM, Colyn Case on earthlink wrote: Jeff said, Why would they not be accurate-- both are in the exhaust stream and the temps are nearly identical. Are they really? mine run 100-150 higher than my egt's. Anyway, GRT wasn't sure about the application: probe length, (slightly) higher temp range etc. --Apple-Mail-1--567380499 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Colyn:

The TIT GAS is cooler than = the exhaust GAS...=A0 it's further down the line...=A0 it's had time to = cool more.

So, = why does TIT READ higher?

Walter


On Jul 7, = 2007, at 7:34 PM, Colyn Case on earthlink wrote:

Jeff said, Why would they = not be accurate-- both are in the exhaust stream and the temps are = nearly identical.
=A0
Are they really?=A0 mine run 100-150 higher than my = egt's.
Anyway, GRT wasn't sure about the = application: probe length, (slightly) higher temp range = etc.
=A0


= --Apple-Mail-1--567380499--