X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 14:10:01 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mx2.pshift.com ([216.57.116.7] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTP id 2073151 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 29 May 2007 14:02:35 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.57.116.7; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net Received: from ccaselt2 (unverified [216.57.118.92]) by mx2.pshift.com (Vircom SMTPRS 4.4.568.30) with SMTP id for ; Tue, 29 May 2007 14:01:52 -0400 X-Modus-BlackList: 216.57.118.92=OK;colyncase@earthlink.net=OK X-Modus-RBL: 216.57.118.92=Excluded X-Modus-Trusted: 216.57.118.92=NO X-Modus-Audit: FALSE;0;0;0 X-Original-Message-ID: <030001c7a21b$7352a040$0502a8c0@nvidia.com> From: "Colyn Case on earthlink" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Tru Trak ADI vs. Standard AI X-Original-Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 11:01:56 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02FB_01C7A1E0.C58B85B0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3028 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_02FB_01C7A1E0.C58B85B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Doug, I had a similar conversation with the tru trak guy at sun'n fun. I don't remember the details but I remember a) thinking it was = better than I thought originally and b) still being unconvinced this is = the way to go. I would point out, however, that the tru trak is electric. I = forget if it has its own battery or not. What I chose to do was have an electric ai (with self contained = battery)/electric hsi and backup vac ai and vac dg. So I have to lose (engine or vac pump) + (( both electrical systems ) OR = (both electric instruments)) to lose attitude reference. If I had cheltons I would probably put in vac ai and vac dg. failing = that I would put in a battery backed ai. Colyn ------=_NextPart_000_02FB_01C7A1E0.C58B85B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Doug,

I had a similar = conversation=20 with the tru trak guy at sun'n fun.

I don't remember the = details but=20 I remember a) thinking it was better than I thought originally and = b) still=20 being unconvinced this is the way to go.

I would point out, = however, that=20 the tru trak is electric. I forget if it has its own battery = or=20 not.

What I chose to do = was have an=20 electric ai (with self contained battery)/electric hsi and backup vac ai = and vac=20 dg.

So I have to lose (engine or vac pump) = + (( both=20 electrical systems ) OR (both electric instruments)) to lose attitude=20 reference.

If I had cheltons I would probably put = in vac ai=20 and vac dg. failing that I would put in a battery backed=20 ai.

Colyn

------=_NextPart_000_02FB_01C7A1E0.C58B85B0--