X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 28 May 2007 08:35:55 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mtao05.charter.net ([209.225.8.179] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTP id 2070548 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 27 May 2007 22:21:23 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.225.8.179; envelope-from=farnsworth@charter.net Received: from aa09.charter.net ([10.20.200.161]) by mtao05.charter.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.00 201-2186-121-20061213) with ESMTP id <20070528022040.FPWI1417.mtao05.charter.net@aa09.charter.net> for ; Sun, 27 May 2007 22:20:40 -0400 Received: from karen473fcf455 ([75.139.140.126]) by aa09.charter.net with ESMTP id <20070528022039.HUVL15783.aa09.charter.net@karen473fcf455> for ; Sun, 27 May 2007 22:20:39 -0400 From: "Farnsworth" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: TSIO 550 LOP X-Original-Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 22:20:40 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0069_01C7A0AD.42643BC0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: Acegx9vOB6ZeSQYGT7GCTGz4Fb0cYAAAuwlQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 In-Reply-To: X-Original-Message-Id: <20070528022039.HUVL15783.aa09.charter.net@karen473fcf455> X-Chzlrs: 0 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0069_01C7A0AD.42643BC0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Are you guys factoring in the return to tank fuel for the Continental engine? Are the numbers you are listing the indicated fuel flow or the corrected ( actual ) fuel flow? It has been my experience that the difference between indicated fuel flow and actual fuel flow ( based on fuel burned ) is about 1 GPH. My TSIO powered Legacy: 1. 17,570' pressure altitude; 20,090' density altitude; 2490 RPM; 29.5" MP; 195 KIAS; Indicated Fuel Flow 18.9 GPH 2. 17,430' pressure altitude; 20,310' density altitude; 2510 RPM; 27.1" MP; 193 KIAS; Indicated Fuel Flow 19.1 GPH 3. 16,500' pressure altitude; 19,090' density altitude; 2490 RPM; 27.5" MP; 195 KIAS; Indicated Fuel Flow 19.0 GPH 4. 10,510' pressure altitude; 11,510' density altitude; 2490 RPM; 29.6' MP; 207 KIAS; Indicated Fuel Flow 18.8 GPH 5. 5,050' pressure altitude; 2900 RPM; 60.0"MP; 295 KIAS; indicated Fuel Flow 70.0 GPH Lynn Farnsworth Super Legacy #235 TSIO-550 Powered Race #44 ------=_NextPart_000_0069_01C7A0AD.42643BC0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Are you guys factoring in the = return to tank fuel for the Continental engine? Are the numbers you are listing = the indicated fuel flow or the corrected ( actual ) fuel flow? It has been = my experience that the difference between indicated fuel flow and actual = fuel flow ( based on fuel burned ) is about 1 GPH.

 

My TSIO powered = Legacy:

 

  1. 17,570’ pressure altitude; 20,090’ density altitude; 2490 RPM; = 29.5” MP; 195 KIAS; Indicated Fuel Flow 18.9 = GPH
  2. 17,430’ pressure altitude; 20,310’ density altitude; 2510 RPM; = 27.1” MP; 193 KIAS; Indicated Fuel Flow 19.1 = GPH
  3. 16,500’ pressure altitude; 19,090’ density altitude; 2490 RPM; = 27.5” MP; 195 KIAS; Indicated Fuel Flow 19.0 = GPH
  4. 10,510’ pressure altitude; 11,510’ density altitude; 2490 RPM; = 29.6’ MP; 207 KIAS; Indicated Fuel Flow 18.8 GPH =

      = 5.     5,050’ pressure altitude;          &nbs= p;            = ;            =   2900 RPM; 60.0”MP; 295 KIAS; indicated Fuel Flow 70.0 = GPH

 

 

Lynn = Farnsworth

Super Legacy = #235

TSIO-550 = Powered

Race = #44

------=_NextPart_000_0069_01C7A0AD.42643BC0--