X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 21:30:35 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [64.12.136.171] (HELO imo-m12.mail.aol.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTP id 2070395 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 27 May 2007 18:47:17 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.136.171; envelope-from=PTACKABURY@aol.com Received: from PTACKABURY@aol.com by imo-m12.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.2.) id q.c1e.16eee1ab (58677) for ; Sun, 27 May 2007 18:46:34 -0400 (EDT) From: PTACKABURY@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 18:46:34 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: TSIO 550 LOP X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1180305994" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5365 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1180305994 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 5/27/2007 2:44:18 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, cberland@systems3.net writes: however the answers are somewhat suspect as some folks compensate for temperature and others use a standard airspeed gage Well I do not think that makes a difference in KIAS--only gauge installation error and since we are all probably using the same pitot probe and generally the same location for static ports and probably have a good gauge I am willing to bet installation error difference are very small. To the first order MP, RPM, total temperature, and to some degree weight are taken out of the equation. I suspect also CR, prop design differences between Hartzell, MT, ACI etc are all also second order contributors to cruise performance as a function of fuel burn LOP. But I ask for real world data to see. paul ************************************** See what's free at http://www.aol.com. -------------------------------1180305994 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In a message dated 5/27/2007 2:44:18 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,=20 cberland@systems3.net writes:

<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>however=20 the answers are somewhat suspect as some folks compensate for temperature=20= and=20 others use a standard airspeed gage

Well I do not think that makes a difference in KIAS--only gauge=20 installation error and since we are all probably using the same pitot probe=20= and=20 generally the same location for static ports and probably have a good gauge=20= I am=20 willing to bet installation error difference are very small. To the fi= rst=20 order MP, RPM, total temperature, and to some degree weight are taken out of= the=20 equation. I suspect also CR, prop design differences between Hartzell,= MT,=20 ACI etc are all also second order contributors to cruise performance as a=20 function of fuel burn LOP. But I ask for real world data to see.

paul

See what's free=20= at AOL.com.

-------------------------------1180305994--