X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 50 [XX] (67%) URL: contains host with port number (33%) BODY: text/html email has no html tag Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 23:16:18 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from an-out-0708.google.com ([209.85.132.243] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.9) with ESMTP id 2060199 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 21 May 2007 22:03:35 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.132.243; envelope-from=jfcowell@gmail.com Received: by an-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id b6so532528ana for ; Mon, 21 May 2007 19:02:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=q1RBVFQ0R5s1mH5wlHPsv0zbPE3pYzNSRCnpfviaUfGCOSfjzqOohhBp5OHM5ykuGNe+LhdN+8H1bqaDz/q001Ufjn09Va9MmomnUjOh/iIixGQFXJqrRpKgbV/cAXr+3S86DbjrAXDm22qh/fFdh85BpBIMxS6SvPbMCpxAHR4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=XCmeYWGbqsFGfNpdnEvgjoZUjT6jXUxi/bJ987CJqN+XwqciCQpkykN/pevBJNbMgxDIbpScqRd6ldJB1+jj4PX9DQszPCLPHhSGUljudiYNQNcpInBsJG1HS0E0ws0Y2FxOyCi5sqoK8Xt0BCRv6rAwUnXlFIXxYbw1lEKKhMU= Received: by 10.100.111.16 with SMTP id j16mr16592anc.1179799377330; Mon, 21 May 2007 19:02:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.229.13 with HTTP; Mon, 21 May 2007 19:02:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <9a1019e70705211902j559f671bldfd9f613cd658d20@mail.gmail.com> X-Original-Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 22:02:57 -0400 From: "Jack Cowell" X-Original-Sender: jfcowell@gmail.com X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Re: [LML] XM down? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_85751_31347806.1179799377154" References: X-Google-Sender-Auth: 956e5a809c06a4ef ------=_Part_85751_31347806.1179799377154 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I didn't fly today but did notice a marked change in XM radio reception in the car. On 5/21/07, Rob Logan wrote: > > from http://www.orbitcast.com/ > > Reportedly one of the [XM] satellites (SAT1) is down, and all of > the repeaters are down due to a "software update." Some are saying > that they were told the system is expected to be up within 2 hours, > while others have heard that it will be fully restored in 2 days. > > An XM Spokesman has provided this statement regarding the issue: > > "We are experiencing a temporary degraded performance issue, > which has affected some of our customers. We expect to return > to normal service levels this evening." > > did anyone fly today and notice a loss in XM weather? > > -- > For archives and unsub > http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html > ------=_Part_85751_31347806.1179799377154 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline I didn't fly today but did notice a marked change in XM radio reception in the car.

On 5/21/07, Rob Logan <Rob@logan.com> wrote:
from http://www.orbitcast.com/

Reportedly one of the [XM] satellites (SAT1) is down, and all of
the repeaters are down due to a "software update." Some are saying
that they were told the system is expected to be up within 2 hours,
while others have heard that it will be fully restored in 2 days.

An XM Spokesman has provided this statement regarding the issue:

    "We are experiencing a temporary degraded performance issue,
which has affected some of our customers. We expect to return
to normal service levels this evening."

did anyone fly today and notice a loss in XM weather?

--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html

------=_Part_85751_31347806.1179799377154--