X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
X-SpamCatcher-Score:  30 [X]
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [67.8.181.30] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.1.8)
  with HTTP id 2016629 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:19:09 -0400
From: marv@lancair.net
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Lancair IV turbine yaw solutions?
To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.1.8
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 18:19:09 -0400
Message-ID: <web-2016629@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-2016607@logan.com>
References: <list-2016607@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<div id="_htmlarea_default_style_" style="font:10pt arial,helvetica,sans-serif">I'm curious if there are any NACA/NASA/other reports out there regarding the inverted-V style of ventral fin vs a single  vertically-oriented ventral fin... anybody ever see one?&nbsp; As mentioned countless times here, anecdotal evidence ("He developed it for the garrett conversion and said it was quite effective") is nice but a well-documented aerodynamic test series would be better.&nbsp; Not casting aspersions or throwing stones, just curious.<br><br>&nbsp;&nbsp; &lt;Marv&gt;<br><br><br>"Colyn Case on earthlink" &lt;colyncase@earthlink.net wrote&gt;:<br> <br> Berni,<br>    I have not converted to a turbine.  However,  you can buy a ventral fin <br> kit from Mike Custard at www.advancedaviationinc.com .   He developed it for <br> the garrett conversion and said it was quite effective.<br> <br>
Colyn<br></div>