Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #41022
From: <Sky2high@aol.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Resurrection flight
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 12:08:00 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
In a message dated 3/31/2007 9:16:11 P.M. Central Daylight Time, jhk@clearwire.net writes:
Should not the plural of "Legacy" be "Legacys"?  After all, the name "Legacy" is a proper noun, whereas "legacies" is the plural for the common noun "legacy".
 
And shouldn't there be a collective term for three or more of these aircraft flying or even parked together?  We have the term a murder of crows (and these are smart birds), so why not perhaps a lunacy of Legacys?
JHK (using your full proper name)
 
You are absolutely correct by claiming that "Legacy" is a proper noun (the proper name of an aircraft).  Thus one may certainly use "Legacys" whilst referring to a composition of more than one.
 
But, I digress. You were seeking a descriptive term for a group of Legacys, perhaps one that characterizes the nature of their drivers and passengers with different terms depending on mode of suspension (on wheels or wings).  I.E. A gaggle refers to a group of geese when they are on the ground whilst a skein refers to the group in flight.
 
Perhaps a truancy of Legacys could refer to those unpopulated ground groupings (parked together) only because they have escaped their natural environment of flitting flight.
 
Then again, a promise of Legacys could refer to more than one taxiing for eventual takeoff into their natural environment of flitting flight.
 
Your lunacy of Legacys may be quite apropos for describing a group in close formation flight.
 
Grayhawk
 
PS What about two Legacys?  That concept was skipped in your query.




See what's free at AOL.com.
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster