X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
X-SpamCatcher-Score:  30 [X]
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [68.202.132.19] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.1.7)
  with HTTP id 1901577 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 05 Mar 2007 00:13:10 -0500
From: marv@lancair.net
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Ground Plane
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.1.7
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 00:13:10 -0500
Message-ID: <web-1901577@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <004d01c75ee4$691903f0$0300a8c0@mountain0676a7>
References: <004d01c75ee4$691903f0$0300a8c0@mountain0676a7>
X-Priority: 3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/html;charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<div id="_htmlarea_default_style_" style="font:10pt arial,helvetica,sans-serif"> Posted for "Bryan Burr" &lt;bjburr@mwheli.com&gt;:<br><br> So my question is that if carbon is a great conductor why is another <br>conductive coating needed to improve the ground plane?  In aluminum aircraft <br>nothing more is added to the antenna mount area.<br> <br> I can see this would be a great addition to the ES. I wish it was emphasized <br>when I built it.<br> <br> But am I missing something with the all carbon Legacy?<br> <br> Thanks,<br> Bryan J. Burr<br>
<br></div>