X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
X-SpamCatcher-Score:  30 [X]
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 15:18:09 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-1879119@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <micah@froese.com>
Received: from [64.97.157.181] (HELO n034.sc1.he.tucows.com)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.7)
  with ESMTP id 1879078 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:46:14 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.97.157.181; envelope-from=micah@froese.com
Received: from [192.168.1.100] (151.213.93.1) by n034.sc1.he.tucows.com (7.2.069.1) (authenticated as micah@froese.com)
        id 45B947550081C5A1 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 2 Mar 2007 19:45:18 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID: <45E87ECE.6050800@froese.com>
X-Original-Date: Fri, 02 Mar 2007 14:45:18 -0500
From: Micah Froese <micah@froese.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Engine Dyno
References: <list-1878583@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-1878583@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

My point is that there is too much performance increase that can't be 
accounted for by 325 HP - 310 HP = 15HP.  310 HP may be high number too.


Micah

PS  To be clear, I have a Performance Engine.


>
> Posted for "Douglas Brunner" <douglasbrunner@earthlink.net>:
>
>  Micah,
>  
>  Impressive performance indeed!  Not really sure that it proves the 
> 370 hp
> claim though.
>  
>  D. Brunner
>
> "