X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Return-Path: Received: from [68.202.132.19] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.1.7) with HTTP id 1875621 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 01 Mar 2007 02:06:28 -0500 From: marv@lancair.net Subject: Re: [LML] Re: aileron reflex on LNC2 To: X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.1.7 Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 02:06:28 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <000901c75bc7$528a8de0$98e807a0@engagethoughtware.com> References: <000901c75bc7$528a8de0$98e807a0@engagethoughtware.com> X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1";format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "John Hafen" : Reports are that the new "Boeing" wing tips offered by Lancair offer much better roll authority. That is what I'm putting on my IVP. No winglets. """ I am building a IV-P. I plan to put on the winglets. I understand a side effect of the winglets are increased stick load for banks. Many gliders that extend their wingspan extend the ailerons as well. I was wondering if anyone has considered an aileron extension embedded in the winglet to get a little better roll authority. r.t.s """