In a message dated 2/28/2007 9:29:20 AM Central Standard Time,
colyncase@earthlink.net writes:
It has perhaps nothing to do with the cirrus airframe but it has
everything to do with Cirrus the company. They market to
non-pilots. ...and although their pilot/owner organization seems
pro-active on training issues I'm not sure it's the right message at point of
sale.
Colyn,
All the Cirrus crashes occurred with certificated pilots onboard -- so I do
not see how people who learn to fly that have an accident in a Cirrus is caused
by "marketing". All of us that fly and own aircraft have been the subject of
someone's marketing efforts. We are here because of Lancair's marketing
efforts.
Some of the Cirrus accident pilots are very high time and some are low
time. Cirrus is doing a great job of advancing the new techologies that make
aircraft safer (CAPS parachute, airbags, onboard datalink, high G seats, etc.)
Naturally many customers want these products. Cirrus is also involved with
changing training and giving scenario based training to its customers via its
partners at University of North Dakota and Jeppesen. They lead the industry in
their efforts to produce better trained pilots.
The aircraft is not difficult to fly-- in fact it is much easier that
a IVP--but in spite of Cirrus's best efforts some people will disregard the best
training and best advice you can give them. Why? Can you teach an old dog new
tricks? Can you lead a horse to water and make it drink?
Regards,
Jeff Edwards
LIVP N619SJ.