X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 19:10:25 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [64.12.137.3] (HELO imo-m22.mail.aol.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.7) with ESMTP id 1874986 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:45:13 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.3; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-m22.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id q.c65.dc3ded8 (42805) for ; Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:44:12 -0500 (EST) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 18:44:11 EST Subject: Re: [LML] aileron reflex on LNC2? X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1172706251" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5358 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1172706251 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 2/28/2007 4:40:13 P.M. Central Standard Time, marv@lancair.net writes: What does the group think about reflexing both ailerons up a degree or so? Terrence L235/320 N211AL Terrence, My ailerons are indeed rigged so that both are slightly above the wingtip faired in position. The purpose was to provide a very slight air load in order to reduce the dead band around the system lash and any "flutter" induced by the no-load situation. My view in flight is very quiet ailerons pretty much faired in under the slight load. Hmmmm, would further reflex make me faster? (Speed Demon and Opie, don't read this). Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96 Aurora, IL (KARR) Darwinian culling phrase: Watch This! PS: I do not have a problem banking into a turn. Of course, they have been rigged this way for years so what do I know?


**************************************
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at http://www.aol.com. -------------------------------1172706251 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In a message dated 2/28/2007 4:40:13 P.M. Central Standard Time,=20 marv@lancair.net writes:
<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>What=20 does the group think about reflexing both ailerons up a degree or=20 so?
  Terrence  L235/320 N211AL
Terrence,
 
My ailerons are indeed rigged so that both are slightly above the wingt= ip=20 faired in position. The purpose was to provide a very slight air load i= n=20 order to reduce the dead band around the system lash and any "flutter" induc= ed=20 by the no-load situation.  My view in flight is very quiet ailerons pre= tty=20 much faired in under the slight load.
 
Hmmmm, would further reflex make me faster? (Speed Demon and Opie, don'= t=20 read this).=20
 
Scott Krueger=20 AKA Grayhawk
Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96
Aurora, IL=20 (KARR)

Darwinian culling phrase: Watch This!
 
PS: I do not have a problem banking into a turn.  Of course, they=20= have=20 been rigged this way for years so what do I know?



AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out mor= e about what's free from AOL at AOL.com. <= /BODY> -------------------------------1172706251--