|
Fellow Lancerians,
There was much recent squabbling about
the lack of an electronic copy of the POH. Well, I became greatly
inspired after Bob Mackey sent in the PDF of our venerable document. So
much so that I tried to OCR all the text in order to create a MS Word document
of it. That turned out to be a nightmare, so I just typed it all
in and tried really hard to match the original format.
When Marv gets it posted, take a look
and start modifying to make it correct for your little speedster. I
noticed the original had quite a few factual errors (or maybe they were
true in 1994), but they aren't today. These relate to the privileges
associated with the "Repairman's Certificate" and the restrictions
on maintenance by a non-builder owner. The only privelege that certificate
grants is the signing off of the condition inspection. Maintenance
and alterations can be done by anyone, because Part 43 does not apply,
see the reg itself --- "43.1(b) This part does not apply to
any aircraft for which an experimental airworthiness certificate has been
issued, unless a different kind of airworthiness certificate had previously
been issued for that aircraft". Major alterations do require
coordination with the local FSDO. This should all be detailed in
your "Operating Limitations". Those may list specific sections
of Part 43 that do apply and that is fine, so they do apply. Hope
these comments do not start a flame job.
If you think I am wrong, please contact your local FSDO first and
ask "What restrictions are there on maintenance/alteration of experimental
aircraft?" Also, see the EAA site which very explicitly states
the same thing.
Of course, some specific forms of maintenance/inspection
do require a certificated person, ex. the biennial pitot/static/transponder
checks. There are others, such as on TSOd equipment, if the rules
require a TSO on the equipment for it to be used for the intended purpose,
ex. IFR GPS.
That is just one area that is wrong
in the original, 1994 version of the POH. There are others, related
to V speeds not consistent in different parts of the book and some others
I can't remember. Those I did not correct in this Word doc but you
should be correcting those to match your specific aircraft anyway. I
did clean up some spelling, grammar, formatting etc.
I will be re-doing the POH for my A/C
starting now. First thing will be to eliminate all the references
to the other models of the A/C, putting in the right numbers for the limitations,
performance etc. and the descriptions of the actual systems installed.
You should be able to scan parts of the builder's manuals or blue
prints to find other useful drawings and the most correct wiring diagrams,
especially around the hydraulic pump, since there was certainly a lot of
traffic on that topic.
Enjoy,
Tom Thibault
N4XB, "Dream Catcher"
P.S.
Joe B., please don't get mad at me for
posting this electronic copy, I still want to come to the Labor Day Fly-In. |
|