Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #40238
From: John W. Cox <johnwcox@pacificnw.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Fuelling & Grounding
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 11:33:24 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>

Repeating my earlier post.  Our airline has composite aircraft and we always ground as the first course of action coming into the hangar and the last before tugging it out and back into service.  I believe all aircraft not just composites should be grounded when in a structure without adequate fire suppression.

 

That said, the incident of self service automobile fires have jumped substantially over the last twenty years.  I heard anecdotally that many were women wearing panty hose.  So the moral is don’t wear hose when refueling, polishing, sanding or painting in your hangar.  I will be grounding my aircraft as a policy.  My panty hose are another matter.

 

John Cox


From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of James H. Keyworth
Sent: Saturday, February 24, 2007 4:39 AM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Fuelling & Grounding

 

After reading all the previous related comments, can I reasonably conclude that the safest method for fuelling a composite aircraft might be to attach the grounding lead from the fuel truck directly to the hinged fuel cap (neck & cap combination), or, in the case of a detaching filler cap, to have an attachment point on the rim of the tank neck itself?

 

If so, would this also work in situations of polishing, sanding, painting, et cetera?

 

JHK

Legacy hopeful

Still learning

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster