X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 69 [XX] (53%) BODY: URL with angle bracket subdomain (24%) SPAMTRICK: obfuscated phone number (-23%) BODY: correction: likely legitimate obfuscated series of numbers Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 19:27:50 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from ms-smtp-03.texas.rr.com ([24.93.47.42] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.6) with ESMTP id 1858775 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 18:06:50 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.93.47.42; envelope-from=schaefer@rts-services.com Received: from Master.RTS-Services.com (cpe-66-69-222-238.austin.res.rr.com [66.69.222.238]) by ms-smtp-03.texas.rr.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l1NN61fB015306 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:06:02 -0600 (CST) Received: from RTSLaptop (cpe-66-69-222-238.austin.res.rr.com [66.69.222.238]) (authenticated bits=0) by Master.RTS-Services.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l1NN2wPP002905 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:03:01 -0600 From: "Richard T. Schaefer" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Fuel tank camera for inspection of Lancair fuel tanks X-Original-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:07:35 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <000e01c7579f$69813340$670aa8c0@RTSLaptop> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_000F_01C7576D.1EE6C340" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3028 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcdXdYu0g5ugWrRuQ+OMJ0KsggiXWgAKRXsg X-Spam-Score: -2.239 () AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_70_80,HTML_MESSAGE X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.58 on 192.168.10.101 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C7576D.1EE6C340 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Static build up on the outside of the carbon aircraft will not cause a problem on the inside. Chances are the person pulled the fuel caps and was working near the opening when he drew a sparc. Always have your plane grounded when you open the fuel tank! For those that are building with carbon, you often get a shock when you sand or vacuum on the carbon. r.t.s. _____ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of marv@lancair.net Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 12:11 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: Fuel tank camera for inspection of Lancair fuel tanks Posted for Matt Reeves : You guys have me paranoid now. Are you saying it's a very real possiblity for static from flight to cause a wing to blow up? If a guy blew up from waxing his Lancair, how safe it is to actually fly in an environment that creates static? My airplane is e-glass and honeycomb, not carbon fiber so there really is no way to ground the wings. Some expert opinions? """ VTAILJEFF@aol.com wrote: I would be very cautious about putting an electrical device in a fuel cell. One person has already blown up a Lancair wing and blown himself up in the process, too. And that was just from sanding on the outside of the wing. Jeff Edwards """ -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/ ------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C7576D.1EE6C340 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Static build up on the outside of = the carbon aircraft will not cause a problem on the = inside.

Chances are the person pulled the = fuel caps and was working near the opening when he drew a = sparc.

Always have your plane grounded = when you open the fuel tank!

For those that are building with = carbon, you often get a shock when you sand or vacuum on the = carbon.

r.t.s.

From: = Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of marv@lancair.net
Sent: Friday, February = 23, 2007 12:11 PM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: Fuel = tank camera for inspection of Lancair fuel tanks

Posted for Matt Reeves :

You guys have me paranoid now. Are you saying it's a very real = possiblity
for static from flight to cause a wing to blow up? If a guy blew up from =
waxing his Lancair, how safe it is to actually fly in an environment = that
creates static? My airplane is e-glass and honeycomb, not carbon fiber = so
there really is no way to ground the wings.

Some expert opinions?

"""
VTAILJEFF@aol.com wrote:

I would be very cautious about putting an electrical device in a = fuel
cell.
One person has already blown up a Lancair wing and blown himself up in = the
process, too. And that was just from sanding on the outside of the = wing.

Jeff Edwards
"""

--

For =
archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/=

------=_NextPart_000_000F_01C7576D.1EE6C340--