X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 2 [X] Return-Path: Received: from [68.202.132.19] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.1.6) with HTTP id 1858375 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:56:14 -0500 From: marv@lancair.net Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Fuel tank camera for inspection of Lancair fuel tanks To: X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.1.6 Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 13:56:14 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <00ce01c7577a$55ecaff0$0400a8c0@mountain0676a7> References: <00ce01c7577a$55ecaff0$0400a8c0@mountain0676a7> X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1";format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "Bryan Burr" : What you have to realize is that the Lancair ES that had the explosion problem also was parked on top of a blue plastic tarp. There was absolutely no contact with the ground and the tarp acted as an additional insulator. While there are still risks associated with static creating activities if you make efforts to create a grounding event such as touching the airplane, connecting the airplane to a ground when fueling, wiping it with a damp rag frequently when waxing, buffing, polishing, the risk is minimized. Also, the explosive event happened by blowing the wing off using an air nozzle over an open fuel filler inlet. And the tank had fuel or fuel vapors escaping. All of the factors lead up to the explosive event. Blue tarp, long period of sanding, blowing off the wing using an air nozzle, open fuel port, no frequent attempt to discharge the static. During the painting of my airplane (I had flown 250 hours so fuel had been introduced to the system) I made absolutely sure the painter touched the wings frequently. I made sure he hosed down the floor and used water and wet sanded during the sanding process. I made sure during polishing that he did not go for long periods of using an electric polisher/buffer. We always had safety wire or something touching the ground and the airplane surface he was working on. During fueling I make sure the grounding cable is attached either to the exhaust or to the tow bar plate and I also make sure that the refueling nozzle is contacting the metal ring that seats the fuel cap. Refueling trucks that use certified aircraft refueling hose has a ground wire embedded in the rubber hose that connects to the nozzle.. By touching the nozzle to the fuel cap seating ring another grounding is being made in addition to the regular static grounding cable. Remember that in non carbon fiber airplanes (IE Lancair normal ES) there is no conductivity. E glass does not conduct. So there is no way to fully discharge static. That is why static wicks don't work on an ES. They only discharge the static created by the wick itself. They do nothing for the wing surfaces. Perhaps there is another topic of discussion for using metal based primer during painting and then installing static wicks. You may say that the rubber tires touching the ground are also an insulator. This is true. When I asked the same question the answer was that there is enough dirt, grime, moisture etc. on the tires that static is discharged. This is also why using a grounding cable when refueling is necessary. I also prop my tow bar against the wing being refueled as added measure of safety. Man what a Pandora's box this static thing is in non-carbon plastic airplanes! Bryan N132BB [Jim Frantz put it best a long time ago... our glass airplanes are flying di-electrics. Think capacitor with wings . ]