X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
X-SpamCatcher-Score:   2 [X]
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [68.202.132.19] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.1.6)
  with HTTP id 1856308 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:24:31 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Fuel tank camera for inspection of Lancair fuel
 tanks
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.1.6
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 16:24:31 -0500
Message-ID: <web-1856308@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <440120.31509.qm@web60018.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <440120.31509.qm@web60018.mail.yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1";format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for Matt Reeves <mattreeves@yahoo.com>:

  Hmmm.  This is very interesting.  I'm wondering if static on the OUTSIDE of 
a
wing can blow up the fuel on the inside of the wing, isn't it true that flying
itself creates quite a bit of static?  Especially if you fly in primer?
   
  Or is this not a factor because you are not touching the ground?

   Matt
  
"""
VTAILJEFF@aol.com wrote:
  
  I would be very cautious about putting an electrical device in a fuel cell.
  One person has already blown up a Lancair wing and blown himself up in the
  process, too. And that was just from sanding on the outside of the wing.
  
  Jeff Edwards
"""