|
|
Posted for Kevin Kossi <kevin@airforcemechanical.com>:
I totally disagree on this.
The LML is just such a place to exchange and gain knowledge.
Sure every plane is different, and it's up to each builder to develop it's
own check list that is as unique as it's builder and plane.
But one needs to have a direction and to learn from other builders what
works and what does not. Just like Joe. B said "It's just a Template"
I read every detail about every plane crash I can. I know most of them are
totally different planes than the one I fly,
yet most of the mistakes they make are no different than the ones I could
make.
It's all about what is safest here, and information is safety.
Kevin Kossi
Legacy
New York 73%
On Feb 12, 2007, at 2:25 PM, Marvin Kaye wrote:
Posted for "Kevin Stallard" <Kevin@arilabs.net>:
I think it is available because Columbia is a certificated bird. The
individual manufacturer is responsible for his/her own checklists and
POH. I personally don't think it is appropriate to make this stuff
available online (at least for the experimental airplanes), there are
too many variations between airplanes in the kit building category.
Kevin
"""
|
|