Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 16:37:18 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-1833328@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.98.211.24; envelope-from=cberland@systems3.net
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: [LML] Re: Collaborating on checklists
Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: Collaborating on checklists
Thread-Index: AcdO26kOum/GGA8xR5mYjhMfyRLPCgAAfw6g
From: "Craig Berland" <cberland@systems3.net>


I seldom react emotionally to LML posts.  This business of NOT posting
POH samples on the LML is nonsense.  The LML is a forum to exchange
ideas with every participant, well most of the time that is true.  I
can't imagine why anyone would participate on the LML if they were not
interested in other's opinion.  If you are not able to form your own
opinion as to what is right for you, from others input, then building an
experimental aircraft may not be for you. I am a mechanical engineer
working in the aerospace industry and there have been many times that I
have felt completely inadequate in my attempt to solve build
problems/issues.  Maybe another way to look at it is.....posting and
reviewing other's POH is lot like USING a check list....you are looking
for something that you should do and did not remember to do.
Craig Berland
IV-P