X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:48:29 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m25.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.6] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.6) with ESMTP id 1832292 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:22:08 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.6; envelope-from=MikeEasley@aol.com Received: from MikeEasley@aol.com by imo-m25.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id q.d06.8df1925 (29672) for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:21:03 -0500 (EST) From: MikeEasley@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:21:01 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Collaborating on checklists X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1171290061" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5354 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1171290061 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit My comparison with Columbia was to point out that making the POH available online isn't a rarity, but common. I guess Lancair is hoping a few guys will lose their POH during the build process and will need to purchase a second one. Who knows. Mike -------------------------------1171290061 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

My comparison with Columbia was to point out that making the POH availa= ble=20 online isn't a rarity, but common. I guess Lancair is hoping a few guy= s=20 will lose their POH during the build process and will need to purchase a sec= ond=20 one. Who knows.

Mike

-------------------------------1171290061--