X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
X-SpamCatcher-Score:   1 [X]
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [68.202.132.19] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.1.4)
  with HTTP id 1760911 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:06:13 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Turbine ran off end of runway
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.1.4
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 14:06:13 -0500
Message-ID: <web-1760911@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <op.tl7ldrk4oo3lez@john-study-2>
References: <list-1760797@logan.com>
 <op.tl7ldrk4oo3lez@john-study-2>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1";format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "John Schroeder" <jschroeder@perigee.net>:

  Grayhawk -
  
  Am I to understand that it is not proper to have two humans: Schroeder,
JG/Szot, RJ as the builders of Lancair ES, S/N: ES 160, N58WP? This is exactly
what the FSDO and Registration Branch have, respectively, approved on the
Operating Limitations and Registration. We also got a clear interpretation of
who could apply for the Repairman's Certificate: either Schroeder, JG or Szot,
RJ could apply. Ron Szot applied for, and received, the Repairman's
certificate on Lancair ES ( S/N ES-160), N58WP
  
  This was coordinated in advance with both agencies. We also asked the EAA 
for
an opinion and they concurred.
  
  I believe the original question on the list was whether a corporation could
be listed as the builder; to which I must say: "I do not know."
  
  Cheers,
  
  John