X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
X-SpamCatcher-Score:   1 [X]
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [68.202.132.19] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WEBUSER 5.1.4)
  with HTTP id 1757432 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:48:54 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Verizon issues
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.1.4
Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 22:48:54 -0500
Message-ID: <web-1757432@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <096301c7378c$96f58390$8d11020a@nvidia.com>
References: <list-1756601@logan.com>
 <096301c7378c$96f58390$8d11020a@nvidia.com>
X-Priority: 3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="iso-8859-1";format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit



Posted for "colyncase on earthlink" <colyncase@earthlink.net>:

  Actually I don't like the way you format reply-to headers either.
  It would be nice if you could reply-to the poster if that's what you want
  and reply/all if that's what you want.
  

[The formatting of the LML headers is done specifically so replies 
automatically come back to the LML.  This keeps discussions on the board as 
opposed to everything turning into private conversations.  This is meant to 
benefit The Group as a whole.  It is easy enough to copy/paste the actual 
poster's email address into the "to" box of a reply editor if the return 
message must be sent privately.  <marv>   ]