X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 10 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 15:05:07 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail.stoel.com ([198.36.178.142] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.4) with SMTP id 1752488 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 13:38:28 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=198.36.178.142; envelope-from=JJHALLE@stoel.com Received: from gateway1.stoel.com ([198.36.178.141]) by mail.stoel.com (SMSSMTP 4.1.9.35) with SMTP id M2007011110373031276 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:37:30 -0800 Received: from PDX-SMTP.stoel.com (unknown [172.16.103.137]) by gateway1.stoel.com (Firewall Mailer Daemon) with ESMTP id 946C0AF056 for ; Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:35:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from PDX-MX6.stoel.com ([172.16.103.64]) by PDX-SMTP.stoel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:37:31 -0800 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: And not a moment too soon X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 X-Original-Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2007 10:37:31 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <17E9FE5945A57A41B4D8C07737DB607203891E44@PDX-MX6.stoel.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: And not a moment too soon Thread-index: Acc1cQXK5s9ECDavTU+z1U/GFJ6pNwAO2o/Q From: "Halle, John" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jan 2007 18:37:31.0848 (UTC) FILETIME=[8DD58C80:01C735AF] Brent writes: "Truce." Amen, brother! But a truce is, at a minimum, a two party deal. Everyone always wants a truce just after getting in the last sacrasm. Here is what seems evident. The 420/5 is a good product and generally performs well. The Pinpoint probably is too. There are differnces between them that the market can sort out over time. Neither one of them is a part of a multi-million dollar Honeywell or Collins system and anyone who thinks otherwise needs to get over it. Take a look at McClellan's piece in the current "Flying" on purpose flying single engine piston planes. That said, all of these sytems are beyond awesome compared to what used to be in airplanes of all kinds for most of my life. It's nice to have a 100% accurate set of instruments. Anyone who has been flying more than ten years remember having such a thing back in the good ol' days? Remember precessing gyros? Military ADF needle averaging? Point to point navigation using the RMI and a pencil? Three minute useful battery life if the single altenator failed? The people who have come up with affordable and reasonably reliable EFIS systems for mircoplanes and personal budgets have done us all an immense service and imporved situational awareness and, if we do not overestimate the capability of these systems, safety by orders of magnitude. We owe each and every one of them a debt of gratitude. That includes Crossbow, Chelton, Brent (for whatever role he played whether or not he would have to shoot us if we knew) and even Kirk. There was never a good reason for us to start attacking one another and by now we should have had all the fun we need to have. Let's stop. John J. Halle Stoel Rives LLP 900 SW 5th Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204 (503) 294-9233 office (503 545-4307 cell