X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 1 [X] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 06 Jan 2007 11:02:28 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d20.mx.aol.com ([205.188.139.136] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.4) with ESMTP id 1740538 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 06 Jan 2007 09:09:18 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.139.136; envelope-from=YoSamuel@aol.com Received: from YoSamuel@aol.com by imo-d20.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id q.c5f.b79789e (32915) for ; Sat, 6 Jan 2007 09:08:20 -0500 (EST) From: YoSamuel@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Sat, 6 Jan 2007 09:08:18 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Re: D2 Update part deux/ X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1168092498" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5354 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1168092498 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Brent. Your arguments and logic are very strong. However, I do have one problem that is bothering me. D2 was the exclusive dealer for the Chelton experimental line of products. To the panel builder or the purchaser, the line to Chelton is seamless. Had Chelton set up a system of dealers then the panel builders or purchasers have the option to obtain Chelton products from another source. One source could be perceived as better or more honest or whatever than another. That choice was not available. I think the perception of the buyer here may or should have more weight in front of a judge than a structure set up by a corporation to compartmentalize a product line. Dave. -------------------------------1168092498 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Brent.
 
Your arguments and logic are very strong. However, I do have one proble= m=20 that is bothering me. D2 was the exclusive dealer for the Chelton experiment= al=20 line of products. To the panel builder or the purchaser, the line to=20 Chelton is seamless. Had Chelton set up a system of dealers then the panel=20 builders or purchasers have the option to obtain Chelton products from=20 another source. One source could be perceived as better or more honest or=20 whatever than another. That choice was not available. I think the perception= of=20 the buyer here may or should have more weight in front of a judge than a=20 structure set up by a corporation to compartmentalize a product line.
 
Dave.
 
 -------------------------------1168092498--