X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com X-SpamCatcher-Score: 50 [XX] Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 15:27:59 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp4.na.baesystems.com ([63.164.202.13] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.4) with ESMTP id 1733157 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 03 Jan 2007 11:53:18 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=63.164.202.13; envelope-from=christopher.zavatson@baesystems.com Received: from smtp2.na.baesystems.com (smtp2.na.baesystems.com [10.40.96.13]) by smtp4.na.baesystems.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l03GlPm8007226 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 11:52:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from GLDMS00005.goldlnk.rootlnka.net ([10.44.64.11]) by smtp2.na.baesystems.com (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l03G4J5k021006 for ; Wed, 3 Jan 2007 11:04:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from gldms10601.goldlnk.rootlnka.net ([10.64.39.18]) by GLDMS00005.goldlnk.rootlnka.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 3 Jan 2007 11:04:18 -0500 Received: from GLDMS10607.goldlnk.rootlnka.net ([10.64.39.20]) by gldms10601.goldlnk.rootlnka.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed, 3 Jan 2007 08:04:17 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C72F50.D22A00D5" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Nose strut inspections - all models X-Original-Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 08:04:17 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: Nose strut inspections - all models Thread-Index: AccvSYMn5yA1LVfVSCCijt4qX5VtRQABVkeA From: "Zavatson, Christopher J \(US SSA\)" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 Jan 2007 16:04:17.0949 (UTC) FILETIME=[D289E4D0:01C72F50] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C72F50.D22A00D5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Harry, I am not familiar with the design details of the 'new strut'. In talking with ESCO several years ago, there was talk of eliminating the need to penetrate the strut wall and thus eliminate the leak potential. Does anyone know if the new design has a guide key retainer and penetrations through the strut tube wall? Chris =20 =20 =20 Chris Zavatson N91CZ 360std www.N91CZ.com =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C72F50.D22A00D5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Harry,

I am not familiar with the design = details of the ‘new strut’. In talking with ESCO several years = ago, there was talk of eliminating the need to penetrate the strut wall and = thus eliminate the leak potential. Does anyone know if the new design = has a guide key retainer and penetrations through the strut tube = wall?

Chris

Chris = Zavatson

N91CZ

360std

www.N91CZ.com =

------_=_NextPart_001_01C72F50.D22A00D5--