Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 16:34:00 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-1672016@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.83.119.58; envelope-from=cjensen@dts9000.com
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Operational matters
Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: Operational matters
Thread-Index: AcceboI3p2jodxJGTq2P/vOHwHH63AAUXN2Q
From: "Chuck Jensen" <cjensen@dts9000.com>

Wow, that's really quite a few landings per set of tires. Just curious,
did you happen to log the number of take-offs for each set...just to see
how they compare?

Chuck Jensen
Do Not Archive=20


-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of
Marvin Kaye
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 11:22 PM
To: lml
Subject: [LML] Re: Operational matters


Posted for "Bob B." <rbelshe@comcast.net>:

 =20
  Here is another data point for tire wear.  Number of landings is more
  interesting
  than number of hours.
 =20
  I have always used the Cheng-Shen tires.
 =20
  Bob Belshe
  Moraga, CA
  Lancair 235/320
 =20
  http://home.comcast.net/~rbelshe/
 =20

  	 	  	 Tire History	  	  =09
  	 	  	  	  	  =09
  	DATE	  	 TOTAL	 HOURS LANDINGS=09
  	REPLACED	 TTAF	 LANDINGS	 THIS SET=09
  	4/17/1996	 89	 127	 89	 127=09
  	10/23/1996	 183	 304	 94	 177=09
  	8/4/1998	 257	 505	 74	 201=09
  	3/4/1999	 337	 667	 80	 162=09
  	12/23/1999	 433	 836	 96	 169=09
  	5/7/2003	 503	 1011	 70	 175=09
  	3/21/2004	 579	 1200	 76	 189=09
  	4/15/2005	 664	 1397	 85	 197=09
  	11/19/2006	 766	 1653	 102	 256=09
 =20
 =20

--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/