|
In a message dated 11/23/2006 1:07:56 P.M. Central Standard Time,
elippse@sbcglobal.net writes:
An antenna in free-space may have the nice toroidal,
donut-shaped pattern, but when mounted on some vehicle, its pattern may be
distorted, leaving holes or nulls in various directions. These nulls may be
caused by blockage, but more often due to nearby metallic objects which
re-radiate the signal at some phase angle which may be destructive.
Consider, for example, elevator and aileron push-pull tubes and wiring. When
these are of a length that is an apprecible fraction of the average 105"
wavelength, and are within a wavelength, and somewhat parrallel, interesting
things happen to the toroidal pattern; it's as if your cat was taking bites
out of the donut.
If you have fibreglass wings, the LE
of the wing root is a good mounting place for the
horizontally-polarized nav signal. A signal-splitter has an inherent loss
of dividing the signal power to each receiver, so if you have two receivers,
each will receive slightly less than 1/2 power, a 3dB loss. That shouldn't be
too bad for a close-up localizer. A tip-off that destructive interference is
taking place is that the reception changes with frequency, some
channels being better than others. As far as GS is concerned, that's a
much higher frequency, so it should not have coincident loss of signal. That
would seem to be more in line with some blockage. Are the nav and GS antennas
coincident in mounting? You might also check each coax for poor connections
that allow leakage at the connector which also can be destructive, as well as
possibly a shorted coax. Get hold of a SWR tester and check these
lines.
Paul,
Thanks for a more technical explanation. Hmmmmm, the old swept-back
nav antenna was a center tap arrangement running the width of the small
horizontal - maybe about 4 feet or about half the wavelength - The push
pull tubes are not at right angles since the antenna "wings" are swept back just
like the external whiskers often observed on those funny "standard" tin
airplanes - but, on a good approach, the durn thing has to look thru the
people in the cockpit, the engine and the carbon in the main wing spar, about 3
degrees down from the antenna placement. Oh well, works pretty
good for me......
My biggest problem is the comm antenna in the vertical tail - the nulls are
greatest radiating along the aircraft centerline. Bummer.
Scott Krueger
AKA Grayhawk Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96 Aurora, IL (KARR)
A man
has got to know his limitations.
|
|