X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2006 09:53:02 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1426043@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <billhogarty@hughes.net>
Received: from [64.97.144.122] (HELO n126.sc0.cp.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.4)
  with ESMTP id 1425219 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 19:27:07 -0400
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.97.144.122; envelope-from=billhogarty@hughes.net
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (69.19.84.131) by n126.sc0.cp.net (7.2.069.1) (authenticated as billhogarty@hughes.net)
        id 451C056F0001861F for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 28 Sep 2006 23:26:19 +0000
X-Original-Message-ID: <451C5A0C.7080102@hughes.net>
X-Original-Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 16:26:04 -0700
From: billhogarty <billhogarty@hughes.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Windows/20060909)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: EFB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

I just came across Carl Cadwells thread of 8/23/04 on this topic (Pocket 
Plates vs AOPA vs Seattle Plates) and sure would appreciate an update.

Anyone else care to comment?

Thanks,  Bill Hogarty