X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2006 14:22:33 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.190] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.3) with ESMTP id 1360712 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 02 Sep 2006 01:53:37 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.233.182.190; envelope-from=blackoaks@gmail.com Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id l35so786742nfa for ; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 22:52:55 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=Oiuz6eB4Rqt25S/msuesucTNzrevwlKsuEguvchmj+nnGkdUuzYom25PgaUXk3dmqBSuY0E4YxnrlKgo1c6llAE22o/R45Jzy0rXvpkikcHsX1usiQxNaHYEZeKlRLBWWeZj6qKmEurh0TfkJxZNG66t2Mys47RszBY3L+vr3Kw= Received: by 10.49.92.18 with SMTP id u18mr3923533nfl; Fri, 01 Sep 2006 22:52:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.48.238.8 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Sep 2006 22:52:54 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <254321ea0609012252i1577e84p45084f623aab4232@mail.gmail.com> X-Original-Date: Fri, 1 Sep 2006 22:52:54 -0700 From: "John McMahon" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: What type Lancair are you building? In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_Part_141385_27383868.1157176374772" References: ------=_Part_141385_27383868.1157176374772 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Thanks for filling in the blanks Gary, I knew there were the 200 series but didn't know the exact numbers and so I skipped over them. Didn't mean to slight anybody;0) Without them, there would be none of the others including the Columbias On 9/1/06, Gary Edwards wrote: > > *...I know we all think the model we are building is the greatest and > only Lancair, but with all the variations out now, it would be most helpful > if everyone could indicate what plane you are talking about. Remember there > are the 320, 360, Legacy, ES, ES 2 door, ESP, IV, IVP and I'm sure I missed > some others. They are not all the same!...* > ** > Yes, you did miss a couple of Lancairs; the very first ones: 200 and > 235. Those are the ones that put Lancair on the map and gave Lancair name > recognition, but most new builders, from about '95 on, aren't aware of the > full Lancair history. > > Gary Edwards > LNC2 N21SN 235/320 > Medford, Oregon > -- John McMahon Lancair Super ES, N9637M ------=_Part_141385_27383868.1157176374772 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Thanks for filling in the blanks Gary,  I knew there were the 200 series but didn't know the exact numbers and so I skipped over them.  Didn't mean to slight anybody;0)  Without them, there would be none of the others including the Columbias

On 9/1/06, Gary Edwards <gary21sn@hotmail.com> wrote:
...I know we all think the model we are building is the greatest and only Lancair, but with all the variations out now, it would be most helpful if everyone could indicate what plane you are talking about.  Remember there are the 320, 360, Legacy, ES, ES 2 door, ESP, IV, IVP and I'm sure I missed some others.  They are not all the same!...
 
Yes, you did miss a couple of Lancairs; the very first ones:  200 and 235.  Those are the ones that put Lancair on the map and gave Lancair name recognition, but most new builders, from about '95 on, aren't aware of the full Lancair history.
 
Gary Edwards
LNC2 N21SN 235/320
Medford, Oregon



--
John McMahon
Lancair Super ES, N9637M ------=_Part_141385_27383868.1157176374772--