X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 14:23:44 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-1337449@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <PJHWFD@aol.com>
Received: from imo-m21.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.2] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.3)
  with ESMTP id 1336763 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 05:30:02 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.2; envelope-from=PJHWFD@aol.com
Received: from PJHWFD@aol.com
	by imo-m21.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r7.6.) id q.be4.2de4757 (39331)
	 for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 05:29:18 -0400 (EDT)
From: PJHWFD@aol.com
X-Original-Message-ID: <be4.2de4757.3216e26e@aol.com>
X-Original-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 05:29:18 EDT
Subject: Re: [LML] MT vs. Hartzell prop for the Legacy?
X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1155893358"
X-Mailer: 9.0 for Windows sub 5125
X-Spam-Flag: NO