I was looking at a friends Lancair 4PT the other day and what I found really scared me.
Seems that Lancair is telling builders to use the belly tank as a header tank, and there is
a vent that has an solenoid (electric) that is closed when the master is switched on.
The theory seems to be that when the plane is refueled, the master is off and therefore solenoid open and any
air in the system can escape at that time.
First, it is ridiculas to use a belly tank as a primary tank on one of these little planes.
This means that the belly will always be the tank to have the last bit of fuel in the plane.
It is completely dangerous to do this simply because of a potential gear up landing intentional or not......
Second, it seems to me that when the plane is low on fuel, clearly there is the potential
of air getting into the belly tank when either wing gets low.
These planes can climb really aggressivly. When this happens, the fuel rolls aft, and
now the pump can pull air.
It is completely non-standard to gravity feed fuel in a low wing aircraft.
On a turbine aircraft,,, No way.
I don't even want to think about what would happen if this little electic solenoid would
fail... If it didn't close, the electic fuel pump will have a much easier time pulling air than fuel...
I can't imagine that there haven't been failures of this sort already.
I am suggesting to him that there be a way to purge air from the fuel system all the time.
Also, he should use the fuel in the belly first, and use it completely. A simple selector valve
would take care of this. Some selectors even have a return line built into them for injected piston engines that need
it. You should have a return to a vented wing.
Another way would be to pump the belly to a wing, as needed.
Maybe a small header tank after the electric fuel pump, with a reduced fitting on the top for a return to purge any air in the system.
A reduced fitting will keep the pressure up but also purge any air back to a vent wing.
I find it difficult to believe Lancair would endorse such a fuel system as it stands now.
It would never pass an FAA system check. They must have never run this past a FAA system DER.
I certainly hope the insurance company's that underwrite these planes never hear about this.
Seems to me just a flameout waiting to happen.
Please anyone tell me where my mis guidance is.....