X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 21:06:51 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.69] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.3) with ESMTP id 1331237 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:20:04 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.69; envelope-from=tthibaultsprint@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=S91JwGc2y8EC/zqhvyHOGZxClSMpsMjjEktG+6WACiVesTRtMSJtKW3EJJkyfpLL; h=Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [209.86.224.42] (helo=elwamui-muscovy.atl.sa.earthlink.net) by elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1GCiuD-0007e3-He for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:19:25 -0400 Received: from 199.46.200.234 by webmail.pas.earthlink.net with HTTP; Mon, 14 Aug 2006 16:19:25 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <20607463.1155586765553.JavaMail.root@elwamui-muscovy.atl.sa.earthlink.net> X-Original-Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 13:19:25 -0700 (GMT-07:00) From: Tom Thibault Reply-To: Tom Thibault X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] LNC2 w/Broken Spinner Back Plate Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: EarthLink Zoo Mail 1.0 X-ELNK-Trace: de8bf13def69c2f69bce407a0563371ed780f4a490ca69563f9fea00a6dd62bc2434b76ccbbbcdc738104e198edcfc2e350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 209.86.224.42 Scott wrote that the rivets on the doublers for the spinner back plate should be bucked not squeezed. Does anyone know why this is so? What other cases demand one method versus the other? Thanks for all the help. Tom Thibault N4XB