X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2006 12:40:46 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([68.142.198.205] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1c.2) with SMTP id 1312886 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 23 Jul 2006 18:01:25 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.142.198.205; envelope-from=rjones2000@sbcglobal.net Received: (qmail 80886 invoked from network); 23 Jul 2006 22:00:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO SONYVAIO) (rjones2000@sbcglobal.net@71.141.111.133 with login) by smtp106.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 23 Jul 2006 22:00:39 -0000 From: "rjones2000" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Lycoming oil coolers X-Original-Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 15:00:40 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <002001c6aea3$70fcb630$4901a8c0@SONYVAIO> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0021_01C6AE68.C49DDE30" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Thread-Index: Acauiin/XRUaHI16R1qESnK5HX/4dQAGNREQ In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0021_01C6AE68.C49DDE30 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mike, Thanks for the info about oil coolers. You mentioned Niagara Thermal asserted they could build a superior design. I Google'd them and found their web site. As near as I can tell, they don't have an oil cooler product for the IO-550N. Is this correct? If they have such a product, can you point me (and other interested builders on this list) to it? Thanks, Ron Ron Jones Legacy Innovations Xango Distributor ron@legacy-innovations.com 408-270-6250 Main 408-580-7531 Mobile _____ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of MikeEasley@aol.com Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 12:00 PM To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: [LML] Re: Lycoming oil coolers Gary, I had a long discussion on the phone with the chief engineer at NDM, now Niagara Thermal. This was several months ago when I was tracking down IO-550N oil cooling issues. Interestingly, the oil cooler designs that we have available to us on our certified engines are hopelessly outdated. They are required by FAA rules to build the coolers with the original design and performance to receive PMA approval. He said the current technology would allow them to build far superior coolers. Mike Easley ------=_NextPart_000_0021_01C6AE68.C49DDE30 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Mike,

Thanks for the info about oil coolers. =

You mentioned Niagara Thermal asserted they could = build a=20 superior design. I Google'd them and found their web site. As = near as=20 I can tell, they don't have an oil cooler product for the IO-550N. Is = this=20 correct?

If they have such a product, can you point me = (and other=20 interested builders on this list) to it?

Thanks,

Ron

Ron Jones
Legacy=20 Innovations
Xango=20 Distributor
ron@legacy-innovations.com

408-270-6250=20 Main
408-580-7531 Mobile

From: Lancair Mailing List=20 [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of=20 MikeEasley@aol.com
Sent: Sunday, July 23, 2006 12:00=20 PM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: = Lycoming oil=20 coolers

Gary,

I had a long discussion on the phone with the chief engineer at = NDM, now=20 Niagara Thermal. This was several months ago when I was tracking = down=20 IO-550N oil cooling issues. Interestingly, the oil cooler designs = that we=20 have available to us on our certified engines are hopelessly = outdated. =20 They are required by FAA rules to build the coolers with the original = design and=20 performance to receive PMA approval. He said the current = technology would=20 allow them to build far superior coolers.

Mike Easley

------=_NextPart_000_0021_01C6AE68.C49DDE30--