Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #35888
From: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: IVP Crash
Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 00:46:50 -0400
To: <lml>
Posted for "Tom Gourley" <tom.gourley@verizon.net>:

 Good suggestion.  I first tried this several years ago in a Grumman AA-1A. I
lined up on a highway, went to takeoff climb configuration and airspeed, and
at 3000' I pulled the throttle.  At that point I pushed the nose over to
maintain best glide and made a teardrop turn to line up on the highway in the
opposite direction.  I tried this a few times using various bank angles in the
turns and, as I recall, I couldn't complete the manuever without losing nearly
1000'.  (Granted, the AA-1A has a poor glide angle and I'm sure other
aircraft, and pilots, could do better.)  I decided at that point that if I
ever lost power on takeoff I would not attempt to return to the runway unless
I was at least at pattern altitude, and not even then if the area around the
end of the runway didn't have some reasonably open fields as backup.
 
 Earlier this year I had the sad experience of watching a Mooney 231 attempt
to make a hard turn (greater than 90 degrees heading change) at low altitude
in an attempt to make a runway after a power loss.  (He had not taken off from
this runway, but turned toward it after having a power loss in flight.) Part
way through a very aggressive turn the nose and right wing dropped noticeably.
 I could see him start to recover, but he didn't have enough altitude.  He
didn't make it.  The really sad part was the hard turn to a runway wasn't
necessary.  There was a few hundred acres of open field in front of him before
he made the turn.  If the engine quits save your butt, not the airplane.
 
 Tom Gourley
 
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster