X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:41:51 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.72] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 1101309 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:33:06 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.72; envelope-from=aadamson@highrf.com Received: from ibm68aec.bellsouth.net ([68.154.105.130]) by imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060511223221.TBSA13458.imf24aec.mail.bellsouth.net@ibm68aec.bellsouth.net> for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:32:21 -0400 Received: from Typhoon ([68.154.105.130]) by ibm68aec.bellsouth.net with ESMTP id <20060511223221.ETOC20933.ibm68aec.bellsouth.net@Typhoon> for ; Thu, 11 May 2006 18:32:21 -0400 From: "Alan K. Adamson" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Ok, *Lancair* racers X-Original-Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 18:32:13 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <002801c6754a$c2e56100$0501a8c0@highrf.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0029_01C67529.3BD3C100" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Thread-Index: AcZ1SdCiV5xJj5X5Rj2g2TWH09K+fwAAEzGA In-Reply-To: This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0029_01C67529.3BD3C100 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Yes, but the problem with that is thats over the weight limit. The c-1b is up *to* 2200lbs or there about, I think it's actually 750kg - 1000kg's. (1653lb - 2204lbs) The next size up the c-1c is 1000kg - 1750kg (2204lbs - 3858lbs) and there is some serious competition there... The IV's would have to play in that later category I believe. Info here. www.fai.org/records Alan _____ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of colyncase on earthlink Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 6:25 PM To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: [LML] Re: Ok, *Lancair* racers Alan said, I suspect it would take a 4 cyl (due to fuel burn), obviously, extra fuel that can fit within the TO weight limit but who knows... A IVP with 140 gals should be able to top that easily (that's about 3340lbs with pilot) ...but while I'm there, Anybody have fuel flow numbers for a IVP at 250 knots/fl240 ? My crude calculations say it should be less than 15GPH LOP Colyn ------=_NextPart_000_0029_01C67529.3BD3C100 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Yes, but the problem with that is thats = over the=20 weight limit.  The c-1b is up *to* 2200lbs or there about, I think = it's=20 actually 750kg - 1000kg's.  (1653lb - 2204lbs) The next size = up the=20 c-1c is 1000kg - 1750kg (2204lbs - 3858lbs) and there is some serious=20 competition there... The IV's would have to play in that later category = I=20 believe.
 
Info here.
 
www.fai.org/records=
 
Alan
From: = Lancair Mailing=20 List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of colyncase on=20 earthlink
Sent: Thursday, May 11, 2006 6:25 PM
To: = Lancair=20 Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: Ok, *Lancair*=20 racers

  Alan said,
I suspect it would take
a 4 cyl = (due to fuel=20 burn), obviously, extra fuel that can fit within the TO
weight limit = but who=20 knows...
 
A IVP with 140 gals should be able to = top that=20 easily (that's about 3340lbs with pilot)
...but while I'm there,
Anybody have fuel flow numbers for a = IVP at 250=20 knots/fl240 ?
My crude calculations say it should be = less than=20 15GPH LOP
 
Colyn
 

 ------=_NextPart_000_0029_01C67529.3BD3C100--