X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 05 May 2006 01:50:09 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mx.webminders.com ([66.165.106.125] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTPS id 1092944 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 05 May 2006 01:31:51 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.165.106.125; envelope-from=jskiba@icosa.net Received: from c-24-12-197-165.hsd1.il.comcast.net ([24.12.197.165] helo=basementdell) by mx.webminders.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1Fbsu5-0001Hn-HQ for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 05 May 2006 01:31:01 -0400 From: "Jeffrey W. Skiba" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: WLS primmer X-Original-Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 00:31:25 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <002001c67005$285ed9d0$0300a8c0@basementdell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 Thread-Index: AcZvzPWImwvAtdjuThmZ87GkKchnoQANzOXw In-Reply-To: X-Local-Fixups: YES X-Headers-Begin: 1Fbsu5-0001Hn-HQ X-Authenticated-As: X-Headers-End: 1Fbsu5-0001Hn-HQ Okay, Question for all you Paint - Primmer experts. I am planning on Flying initially in WLS primmer before final paint. My question is: When the WLS is sprayed on it is sort of rough or slightly "dimpled" for lack of a better word, but once sanded a little is very very smooth. If you are going to fly in primmer should you NOT sand smooth the WLS but leave the "dimpled" finish, or can one sand the surface smooth and FLY? I guess the real question is: Does sanding WLS open the sealed primmer up or cause other problems for latter on. I hope that makes sense. Thanks in advance Jeff (Legacy RG Initial primmer for the belly) -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.392 / Virus Database: 268.5.3/331 - Release Date: 5/3/2006