X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 03 May 2006 19:28:52 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [64.4.56.87] (HELO hotmail.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.9) with ESMTP id 1090201 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 03 May 2006 11:21:43 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.4.56.87; envelope-from=n320g@hotmail.com Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Wed, 3 May 2006 08:20:57 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: Received: from 71.143.60.135 by BAY101-DAV15.phx.gbl with DAV; Wed, 03 May 2006 15:20:54 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [71.143.60.135] X-Originating-Email: [n320g@hotmail.com] X-Sender: n320g@hotmail.com From: "N320GG" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: AOA X-Original-Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 08:20:54 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0441_01C66E8A.7F402410" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2869 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 03 May 2006 15:20:57.0293 (UTC) FILETIME=[2D3887D0:01C66EC5] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0441_01C66E8A.7F402410 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Gary, which one would you recommend? Gary Melton N320GG ----- Original Message -----=20 From: Gary Edwards=20 Andres, I can relate more to your AOA contribution than I can with John's = abrasive post. John explains his point of view with a hammer approach = (military style). Terrance also makes a readable case for an AOA. I have no military pilot experience (am envious), although I have = multiple hours in Hueys in Viet Nam. I would be considered a low time = pilot by military standards. I have flown my Lancair without the AOA, = then with the AOA. I like it. For me, I feel it helps me "one notch" = more than without it to be a better pilot. Hopefully, in the future, in = a pinch, it will give me a better advantage. I am a Technical Counselor for an EAA chapter. I speak of the = "nothing to lose by installing an AOA" with builders I am involved with. = They decide whether to install and use it. Gary Edwards LNC2 N21SN ------=_NextPart_000_0441_01C66E8A.7F402410 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Gary, which one would you = recommend?
 
Gary Melton
N320GG
----- Original Message -----
From:=20 Gary=20 Edwards

Andres,
 
I can relate more to your AOA contribution than I can with John's = abrasive post.  John explains his point of view with a hammer = approach=20 (military style).  Terrance also makes a readable case for = an=20 AOA.
 
I have no military pilot experience (am envious), although I have = multiple hours in Hueys in Viet Nam.  I would be considered = a low=20 time pilot by military standards.  I have flown my Lancair = without the=20 AOA, then with the AOA.  I like it.  For me, I feel it = helps me=20 "one notch" more than without it to be a better pilot.  = Hopefully, in the=20 future, in a pinch, it will give me a better advantage.
 
I am a Technical Counselor for an EAA chapter.  I speak = of the=20 "nothing to lose by installing an AOA" with builders I am involved=20 with.  They decide whether to install and use it.
 
Gary Edwards
LNC2 N21SN
------=_NextPart_000_0441_01C66E8A.7F402410--