Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #35135
From: terrence o'neill <troneill@charter.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Flap (Relay) Failure 320
Date: Thu, 06 Apr 2006 21:53:49 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
I LOVE that helmet!  How much?
I think the solid state unit is made from compressed choclate chip cookies.
: )
Terencio LNC2 N211AL
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, April 05, 2006 08:56 PM
Subject: [LML] Re: Flap (Relay) Failure 320

In a message dated 4/5/2006 5:04:06 P.M. Central Daylight Time, n103md@yahoo.com writes:
As many have noted, a common failure mode in the LNC2
is the flap's (electromechanical) relay wiring and contacts.
Has anyone replaced their flap control relays with
solid-state controls? I would expect a considerable
increase in reliability if properly designed.

Taking that idea a step further, the limit switches
could be made latching so that coasting past the
switch would no longer be a problem. i.e. when
the controller detects that the down limit switch
is triggered, it shorts the motor until it detects
the up control switch is closed.

Has anyone done this already?
Or should I go ahead and design it?
Bob,
 
The limit switches detect the presence or absence of the stabilizing rod.  They are self-latching for any flap motor position at or beyond their limit.
 
The relays work just fine for most everyone.
 
However,  Solid state like this:
 
 
 
Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk
LNC2 N92EX IO 320 SB 89/96

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster