X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2006 00:47:39 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mta-out-1.udlp.com ([207.109.1.8] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.7f) with ESMTP id 954570 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:52:12 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.109.1.8; envelope-from=Christopher.Zavatson@baesystems.com Received: from mnexch01.MSGDOMAIN.MPLS.UDLP.COM ([10.1.62.20]) by mta-out-1.udlp.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k0QEUWbm009814 for ; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 08:30:32 -0600 Received: from asdmngwia.udlp.com ([10.1.62.22] RDNS failed) by mnexch01.MSGDOMAIN.MPLS.UDLP.COM with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 26 Jan 2006 08:46:32 -0600 Received: from DM-MN-06-MTA by asdmngwia.udlp.com with Novell_GroupWise; Thu, 26 Jan 2006 08:51:20 -0600 X-Original-Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.5.4 X-Original-Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2006 08:51:12 -0600 From: "Christopher Zavatson" X-Original-To: Subject: TCP Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Jan 2006 14:46:32.0758 (UTC) FILETIME=[4C97BD60:01C62287] Does anyone have experience using TCP to help with those pesky chucks of = lead that like to accumulate in the lower plugs. Does the stuff really = work? Are there any drawbacks to its use? Chris Zavatson N91CZ 360 std www.N91CZ.com