X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:32:31 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m27.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.8] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.7f) with ESMTP id 950848 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:13:21 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.137.8; envelope-from=VTAILJEFF@aol.com Received: from VTAILJEFF@aol.com by imo-m27.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r6.3.) id q.1de.4b2c6524 (16781) for ; Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:12:35 -0500 (EST) From: VTAILJEFF@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <1de.4b2c6524.310692b3@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:12:35 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Low Passes X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1138047155" X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5021 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1138047155 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 1/23/2006 1:23:57 PM Central Standard Time, JJHALLE@stoel.com writes: When reality and common sense doesn't support your position, start quoting regs: What part of "reality and common sense" supports your position that high speed low altitude flying is: 1) not hazardous? 2) approved by regulations? 3) condoned by your insurance agent? Gee, the Navy has a reg prohibiting flat-hatting. It also has regs prohibiting rolling in on golf courses but anyone that went thru Beeville in the late 60's did that on his first solo. Jeff, if you went arount preaching that stuff when you were in your squadron, you must have been a real popular guy. I wasn't in it to be popular and my opinions posted here are not intended to be "popular" but rather inform some of the audience that what others pass off as great fun is rather hazardous to one's flying health. Statistic do not lie. 1/3 of all Navy/ Marine Corps/ Air Force losses are controlled flight into terrain. As far as the FAA regs are concerned, I have flown both low passes and overhead breaks at civilian airports and have never violated any of the rules you quoted. I take it from paragraph two that you violated the "no buzzing the golf course" rule. ;) Reagards, Jeff -------------------------------1138047155 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In a message dated 1/23/2006 1:23:57 PM Central Standard Time,=20 JJHALLE@stoel.com writes:

<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>When=20 reality and common sense doesn't support your position, start quoting=20 regs:

What part of "reality and common sense" supports your position that hig= h=20 speed low altitude flying is:

1) not hazardous?

2) approved by regulations?

3) condoned by your insurance agent?

<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>
Gee,=20 the Navy has a reg prohibiting flat-hatting. It also has regs=20 prohibiting rolling in on golf courses but anyone that went thru Beeville=20= in=20 the late 60's did that on his first solo. Jeff, if you went arount=20 preaching that stuff when you were in your squadron, you must have been a=20= real=20 popular guy.

I wasn't in it to be popular and my opinions posted here are not intend= ed=20 to be "popular" but rather inform some of the audience that what others pass= off=20 as great fun is rather hazardous to one's flying health. Statistic do not li= e.=20 1/3 of all Navy/ Marine Corps/ Air Force losses are controlled flight into=20 terrain.

<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>
As=20 far as the FAA regs are concerned, I have flown both low passes and overhe= ad=20 breaks at civilian airports and have never violated any of the rules you=20 quoted.

I take it from paragraph two that you violated the "no buzzing the golf= =20 course" rule. ;)

Reagards,

Jeff

-------------------------------1138047155--