X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:40:22 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mtiwmhc11.worldnet.att.net ([204.127.131.115] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.6) with ESMTP id 934472 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 11:12:55 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.131.115; envelope-from=martell@worldnet.att.net Received: from D90BKR21 (65.cleveland-14-15rs.oh.dial-access.att.net[12.75.71.65]) by worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc11) with SMTP id <2006012016121011100n90s2e>; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 16:12:10 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <000d01c61ddc$44131630$0100007f@D90BKR21> From: "martell lindsay" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Runway checks, passes, flybys. X-Original-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:57:23 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 >> Sorry guys but I just can't sit by without commenting on your testosterone charged foolishness. Half of all midairs occur below 500' AGL in the pattern. Doing a "high speed low altitude" shine your ass pass down the runway is asking for trouble IMHO. We've already had one midair this year with a Lancair and a Cessna 172. << Your point is valid, but please don't mis-state a case to support your conclusion. They weren't below 500' They weren't making a high speed pass. They weren't in the pattern. Am I being overly sensitive? Probably -- they were my two best friends and I miss them. martell lindsay