X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 23:40:22 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from relay-1.mail.nethere.net ([66.63.128.161] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.6) with ESMTP id 934519 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 12:02:38 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.63.128.161; envelope-from=bnn@nethere.com Received: from scan-1.mail.nethere.net (scan-1.mail [66.63.128.132]) by relay-1.mail.nethere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C108812B51C for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:01:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from mta-1.mail.nethere.net by scan-1.mail.nethere.net with LMTP id 74579-24-69; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:01:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from Dell-P4-2GHz.nethere.com (01-039.015.popsite.net [66.248.17.39]) by mta-1.mail.nethere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA7CD15C8F for ; Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:01:47 -0800 (PST) X-Original-Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.0.20060120082821.01e40ca0@pop3.nethere.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2 X-Original-Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 08:45:35 -0800 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" From: Guy Buchanan Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Runway checks, passes, flybys. In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed At 03:01 AM 1/20/2006, you wrote: >Sorry guys but I just can't sit by without commenting on your testosterone >charged foolishness. Boy Jeff, I hope you've got your Nomex on! I don't know if I worry much about a carefully executed high speed pass, though the statistics tend to suggest they'll eventually shorten your life span. I do have a problem with the overhead break pattern entry, though. It would be fine if it were SOP at all times, because everyone would be doing it, expecting it, (relatively) competent at it; just like in the military. I don't think, however, that it mixes well with the FAA standard 45 degree pattern entry that GA pilots are taught. I also don't think it mixes will with a standard GA pattern, that has aircraft spread all over the sky, +/-200' and +/- 1/2 mile. (It's not desirable, but it's reality at most of the airports I visit.) As soon as the upwind aircraft breaks to the downwind it becomes blind to half the pattern, including the 45 degree inbound leg. I know it's easy to say the turning aircraft has right-of-way, and that everyone on the downwind should keep clear, but I don't think that's right; the established aircraft should have right-of-way, and aircraft entering the pattern should keep clear. Here in Ramona we used to have a lot of upwind entries before the control tower was installed. Indeed the fire bombers used an upwind entry exclusively. (Incidentally they were responsible for the only pattern midair in recent memory, when a fire bomber dropped in on a fire spotter turning final.) The fire squadron put a lot of pressure on the FAA to get a tower into Ramona, to make their operations safer. Interestingly, they are no longer allowed an upwind break pattern entry, but have to enter on downwind, base, or land straight in, like everybody else. Guy Buchanan K-IV 1200 / 582 / 99.9% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar.